Constitutional Provisions

According to Tunisia's 2014 Constitution, the right to life "is sacred and cannot be prejudiced except in exceptional cases regulated by law".Article 22, 2014 Constitution of Tunisia.It is further stipulated that the state "protects human dignity and physical integrity, and prohibits mental and physical torture".Article 23, 2014 Constitution of Tunisia.Every prisoner has "the right to humane treatment that preserves their dignity".Article 30, 2014 Constitution of Tunisia.The right to "assembly and peaceful demonstration is guaranteed" under the Constitution.Article 37, 2014 Constitution of Tunisia.

Treaty Adherence

Global Treaties

Adherence to Selected Human Rights Treaties
1966 Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) State Party
ICCPR Optional Protocol 1 State Party
1984 Convention against Torture (CAT) State Party
Competence of CAT Committee to receive individual complaints Yes
CAT Optional Protocol 1 State Party
Adherence to International Criminal Law Treaties
1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court State Party

Regional Treaties

Adherence to Regional Human Rights Treaties

1981 African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights    State Party
1998 Protocol to the African Charter on the African Court State Party
Article 34(6) declaration regarding individual petitions Yes
Adherence to International Criminal Law Treaties at Regional Level
Malabo Protocol on the African Court of Justice and Human Rights  Not party
Adherence to Regional Human Rights Treaties
2004 Arab Charter on Human Rights State Party

National Legislation

Police Use of Force

Police use of force is regulated by the 2015 Penal Code. Use of unlawful violence by a public official is subject to a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment.(see below section on Accountability for Potentially Unlawful Use of Force). The Penal Code, is though, very expansive on its criminalisation of behaviour. As Human Rights Watch has observed, Article 125 criminalises “insulting a public official”. This, the organisation reports, 

has served in practice as a means by which the police can arrest individuals—some of whom ended up being prosecuted and imprisoned—merely for arguing with police, being slow to heed orders, or were suspected when they filed a complaint of being likely to file a complaint against police.

Earlier repressive laws also remain in force, despite calls for their revision, such as Law No. 69-4 of 24 January 1969 regulating assemblies. Despite the constitutional right of peaceful assembly, according to this law, if police officers call for the dispersal of a crowd and the demonstrators do not comply, the police are authorised to, progressively, use water cannon or baton charges; fire tear gas; use firearms to fire warning shots in the air; fire warning shots above the heads of the demonstrators; and then fire at their legs.Chap. IV (Use of Weapons), Art. 21, Law No. 69-4 of 24 January 1969 regulating public meetings, processions, marches, demonstrations, and crowds.If they still fail to disperse, the police may aim for central body mass or even potentially the head.Art. 22, Law No. 69-4 of 24 January 1969 regulating public meetings, processions, marches, demonstrations, and crowds.

According to the Penal Code, any public official who, in the exercise of his functions, without legitimate justification, uses or causes the use of violence towards others shall be liable to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 120 dinars.Art. 101, 2012 Penal Code (unofficial translation).In addition, any public official who, in the exercise of his functions, inflicts torture on another shall be liable to eight years' imprisonment.Art. 101bis, 2012 Penal Code (unofficial translation).

In 2016, the UN Committee on Enforced Disappearance expressed its concern about Law No. 22/2015 on the fight against terrorism, which does not guarantee access to a lawyer or relatives during the custody period. This can allow the police to hold suspected terrorists in incommunicado detention for up to fifteen days, with a prosecutor’s consent after the fifth day.Committee on Enforced Disappearance, Concluding Observations on Tunisia's national report, UN doc. CED/C/TUN/CO/1, 25 May 2016, §29.

Police Oversight

The National Assembly passed legislation in 2013 to create the National Body for the Prevention of Torture. Its duties include periodically inspecting detention facilities for evidence of torture or other inhumane treatment or punishment. The Assembly also passed legislation in December 2013 to create the Truth and Dignity Commission, whose task is to investigate human rights violations occurring between 1 July 1955 and the end of 2013. It was established for a four-year period with an option for a one-year renewal, although this option was not taken up and, as of writing (February 2018), the Commission had still to deliver its final report.



Views and Concluding Observations of United Nations Treaty Bodies

In its 2020 Concluding Observations on Tunisia, the Human Rights Committee called on Tunisia to:

Ensure that legislative and regulatory provisions governing the use of force comply with the Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, that law enforcement officials apply non-violent measures before any use of force when conducting demonstration control operations and that law enforcement officials respect the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality and accountability.

In 2016, the UN Committee against Torture published its Concluding Observations on Tunisia's third periodic report under the 1984 Convention against Torture. It stated that:UN Committee against Torture, Concluding Observations on Tunisia's third periodic report, UN doc. CAT/C/TUN/CO/3, 10 June 2016, §15.

Torture is practised particularly by officers of the police and National Guard when holding a person in custody, and especially against terrorism suspects. ... The Committee is also concerned about reports that the Ministry of the Interior has sometimes misinterpreted the counter-terrorism law by refusing to reveal the identity of officers suspected of torture to the judge in charge of the investigation

The Committee called on Tunisia to:UN Committee against Torture, Concluding Observations on Tunisia's third periodic report, UN doc. CAT/C/TUN/CO/3, 10 June 2016, §20(a).

Ensure that all complaints of torture or ill-treatment are promptly investigated in an impartial manner and with due diligence by independent judicial officials, and that persons suspected of such acts are duly tried and, if found guilty, are punished in a manner commensurate with the gravity of their acts

It further called on Tunisia to ensure "the impartiality of inquiries conducted by the police, for example by transferring the judicial police service to the Ministry of Justice" and "that persons suspected of torture or ill-treatment are immediately suspended from duty for the duration of the investigation, particularly when there is a risk that they might otherwise be in a position to repeat the alleged act, to take reprisals against the presumed victim or to obstruct the investigation".UN Committee against Torture, Concluding Observations on Tunisia's third periodic report, UN doc. CAT/C/TUN/CO/3, 10 June 2016, §20(c) and (d).

A number of individual complaints have been made to the Committee against Torture on the behaviour of the Tunisian security and prison services. In a decision published in October 2017, the Committee found that Rached Jaïdane, a Tunisian national born on 25 March 1963 in Tunis, had indeed been the victim of acts of torture lasting seventeen hours during his detention at the hands of the security services for alleged terrorist activities and subsequently during his detention for a further twenty days. At his trial, he was convicted and sentenced to 26 years in prison. The complaint affirmed that:Committee against Torture, Decision adopted by the Committee under article 22 of the Convention, concerning communication No. 654/2015, UN doc. CAT/C/61/D/654/2015, 3 October 2017, §2.18.

Rached Jaïdane was released in February 2006 after 13 years of torture and ill-treatment in Tunisian prisons. He continues to suffer severe physical and psychological after-effects of the torture, which have entailed a disability rate of 35 per cent. He suffers, among other after-effects, from an implosion of the right eye, a deviation of the nasal pyramid, buzzing in the ears, positional vertigo, multiple dental fractures, aggravation of a hernia and a varicocele, and post-traumatic neurosis.... Rached Jaïdane is unable to father a child because of several of these pathologies.

Based on the circumstances and the available evidence, the Committee concluded that "the complainant’s allegations must be taken fully into account; that the abuse to which he was subjected was perpetrated by officials of the State party in an official capacity; and that the acts in question constitute acts of torture within the meaning of article 1 of the Convention".Committee against Torture, Decision adopted by the Committee under article 22 of the Convention, concerning communication No. 654/2015, UN doc. CAT/C/61/D/654/2015, 3 October 2017, §7.4. 


Figures provided by the Tunisian government in Tunisia’s third periodic report to the UN Committee against Torture indicated that of 230 cases of excessive use of force by the security forces heard by courts between 1 January and 1 July 2014, six were dismissed for lack of evidence or on other legal grounds, three resulted in prison sentences and fines in absentia, two in suspended prison sentences, and twenty cases were transferred to the Permanent Military Court in Tunis. The remaining 165 cases were still under investigation at the time the report was written.Committee against Torture, Third periodic report of Tunisia, Addendum, Additional updated report, 13 October 2014.



2012 Penal Code (in French)

Law 69-4 on Public Assemblies (in French original)

Text of 2015 Anti-Terrorism Law (in French)

Human Rights Committee Concluding Observations on Tunisia (2020)

Committee against Torture Decision on Individual Communication (2017)